Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 24137

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : JC10 - JC14 Full Version

Perception of First Year Medical Students towards a New Histology Module in a Medical College in Eastern India: A Quasi-experimental Study


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62532.18474
Rituparna Basu, Tapati Roy

1. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Tapati Roy,
Akshaya Bhaban, Naskar Para (Near Milan Sangha Club), Tentulberia, P.O. Garia, Kolkata-700084, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: tapatiroy74@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The post-COVID (Coronavirus) era, the transition of our country towards a competency-based curriculum, and our fundamental goal to improve students’ learning experience and academic performance expedite the need to introduce new strategies to the existing teaching-learning method based on principles of medical education in the form of a structured module. Among all subdivisions of anatomy, this is especially relevant for histology because microscopic anatomy poses a basic difficulty associated with the comprehension of microscopic details of human tissues through the novice, untrained eyes of the freshly-admitted first-year medical students.

Aim: To study the perception of first year medical students towards the new histology teaching module.

Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted among 85 first year medical students of Medical College, Kolkata, from May 2022 to October 2022, on histology teaching methods, comparing new histology modules versus traditional histology methods. A student survey was conducted to study their perception regarding the difficulties faced by them during their first-semester histology practical examination. After conducting a literature search, a new learner-centered histology module was designed and implemented among students to address these difficulties. Forty-eight histology sessions were conducted using the new module over a total duration of six months. Students’ feedback regarding the new module was recorded at the end of the sixth month. The collected data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) software version 22.0 (trial version).

Results: A total of 84 (98.8%) of students strongly agreed that because of the preliminary self-study time followed by discussions, quizzes, and brainstorming during the histology sessions, they had an improved understanding of the assigned learning areas. Additionally, 81 (95.3%) of students strongly agreed that their drawing skills of histology diagrams had improved due to drawing practice during the sessions. Furthermore, 83 (97.6%) of students reported an improvement in focusing and correctly identifying slides. Moreover, 82 (96.4%) of students felt that the regular formative assessments and immediate feedback improved their readiness for histology examinations. All of them agreed to the continued practice of the new module in future histology sessions.

Conclusion: The students’ response towards the module was found to be positive. Addressing the students’ recommendations in the future would increase the chances of generating more support for it and enhancing their motivation towards improved academic performance in histology examinations.

Keywords

Medical science, Students perception, Spotting, Active learning

Histology holds a unique position in the medical curriculum since ages and has progressed forward in leaps and bounds over the years with different advancements in the medical sciences (1). In India the implementation of the Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) curriculum initiated an urgent necessity to introduce changes to the present model of teaching histology (2),(3). Instead of using traditional didactic lectures followed by viewing of the designated glass slides, if interactive teaching-learning methods laid down in the CBME booklet (4) were incorporated into histology sessions, it would induce active learning and deep learning of histology by students, which would also enable them to correlate histology with pathology of tissue specimens in the future.

Additionally, if formative assessments followed by immediate feedback were introduced, this would ensure increased student involvement (5) and might improve their feedback-seeking behaviour, exam preparedness as well as their academic performance over time. Importance should also be given to learners’ needs (6) as this would boost student motivation and would, in turn, serve to improve their academic performance in histology.

The post-COVID-19 era, in itself, is a major challenge for many students because of their sudden exposure to a new curriculum in a new environment after a prolonged period of online classes and home isolation during the COVID-19 era. A crucial problem area for the newly admitted first-year students’ (untrained eyes), is spotting the anatomical details of tissues as required of them in histology sessions and examinations.

In order to address these issues and smooth the transition of first-year medical students into histology, a survey was conducted to earmark the areas of difficulty they faced in histology examination and classes. A new learner-centric teaching module, based on the study of Bloodgood RA, was customised according to the students’ needs and was conceptualised by researchers of the present study and introduced among them over a duration of six months (6). In conformation with the elements of the CBME module (4), it combined active learning and self-directed learning exercises along with formative assessments and feedback for histology. Also, students were made to practice on focusing and identification of slides, as well as illustrations of the histology slides, in order to prepare them for histology examinations, as this was an area of difficulty revealed from students’ pre-intervention feedback. Repeated literature searches revealed no such learner-centric module combining all these elements of the CBME module among previous studies in a similar setting and region.

The primary aim of the present study was to study the effectiveness of the new histology teaching module from the perspective of first year medical students at Medical College, Kolkata. The secondary objective of the study was to determine the improvement in understanding of assigned learning areas and to observe the improvement in drawing skills, focusing, and identification of histology slides from the students’ perspective.

Material and Methods

This quasi-experimental study was conducted among the students of the first professional MBBS batch of 2021-2022 for a duration of six months, from May 2022 to October 2022, at Medical College, Kolkata, which has an annual student intake capacity of 250.

The study population was initially taught histology using the conventional histology teaching method during the first semester. Following the first semester histology practical examination, a survey was conducted among 202 students to record their perception regarding the difficulties faced by them during the examination as well as their areas of weakness in histology according to them. A new histology module, designed based on the principles of the CBME curriculum, was introduced. The module design underwent peer review, and Institutional ethical clearance was obtained (MC/KOL/IEC/NON-SPON/1520(01)/08/2022).

A total of 48 histology sessions were conducted using the new module over a duration of six months. At the end of six months, students’ perceptions regarding the new histology module compared to the traditional histology teaching method were obtained through pre-validated, semi-structured, printed questionnaires distributed to them at the end of histology class hours. Prior to the introduction, the questionnaires designed by the researchers of the present study were evaluated by five experts for content validity. The content validity index was calculated to be 0.8. A pilot study was conducted among 20 students to determine the reliability of the questionnaire, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated to be 0.9 (7). The questionnaires consisted of four sections:

Part A: Students’ personal information (5 items),
Part B: Study views (5 items),
Part C: Problems they faced with the new module and their solutions (6 items),
Part D: Their future recommendations to improve the effectiveness of the new module (4 items).

Parts A and B included close-ended, multiple-choice type, and Likert scale questions, whereas parts C and D included open-ended questions.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated using the formula:

n=Zα 2×P×(1-P)/L2

n=Minimum sample size
P=Prevalence level of perceived benefits of the histology module=50%

(In the absence of any previous study on the pros and cons of the new histology module, the prevalence level of its perceived benefits was presumed as 50% to ensure the maximum sample size).

Q=Complement of P=100-P=50%
Zα=1.96 (considering a 95% confidence interval, two-tailed)
L=Absolute error of 10%

Putting the values, n=(1.962×50×50)/102=96, i.e., approximately 100

So, the minimum sample size is 100.
N=Finite population=250

Applying Finite Population Correction (FPC) (as n/N=0.40, which is more than 0.05), the sample size of intervention was revised using the following formula of FPC:

FPC=v{(N-n)/(N-1)}=v{(250-100)/(250-1)}=0.77 (N=Finite population size=250)
The revised minimum sample size is (100×0.77)=77
Assuming a 10% non response rate, the final minimum sample size will be (77+7.7)=85

Thus, 85 students were selected by simple random sampling using the lottery method to ensure equal representation from students and to prevent bias.

Inclusion criteria: All first year medical students, Batch 2021-2022, studying at Medical College, Kolkata, who were willing to participate in this study and willing to give their informed consent were included in the study. Also, students who had atleast 75% attendance in histology classes during the given study period (accepted as a base level after discussion with other faculty members of the Anatomy department) were also included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Students who had less than 75% attendance in histology classes during the given study period and those who were unwilling to participate in the study were excluded.

Elements of the new module (Table/Fig 1) included dedicated self-study time followed by interactive sessions, projection of images of displayed slides with clarification of points of identification, practice of focusing and identification of slides, as well as drawing and labeling of projected histology slides and formative assessments with constructive feedback. (Table/Fig 2) highlights the main differences between the pre-existing method of teaching histology and the new histology teaching module.

At the onset of the study, a survey was carried out among students regarding their difficulties (Table/Fig 1) in histology examinations and classes. A learner-centric, interactive histology teaching module was conceptualised based on the study by Bloodgood RA, incorporating elements of the CBME module, which were introduced among students (3),(6).

A total of 48 histology sessions were conducted using the new module over a duration of six months (May 2022-October 2022). Students were asked to study the histology topic before attending the sessions. According to the module, each two hour histology session was divided into dedicated self-study time of 30 minutes, interactive sessions of 20 minutes, PowerPoint projection of images of focused slides with clarification of points of identification, viewing of slides under microscopes, practice of drawing and labeling histology slides, and formative assessment with immediate feedback (Table/Fig 3). The format of the histology session according to the new module is illustrated in (Table/Fig 4).

Students’ feedback regarding the new module was recorded at the end of the sixth month post-implementation using pre-validated questionnaires designed by the researchers. The questionnaires were printed in English language and circulated among the students at the end of the histology classes.

Statistical Analysis

The collected data from the students’ filled questionnaires were coded and entered into an MS Excel spreadsheet. The data were then transferred to IBM SPSS software version 22.0 (trial version) for further analysis.

Results

The study was conducted on 85 first professional MBBS students with an average age of 19.235 years. Of these, 59 (69.4%) were males and 26 (30.6%) were females. A total of 84 (98.82%) students agreed that the new histology module led to improved understanding of histology compared to the old method of teaching. Additionally, 83 (97.6%) students said it improved their focusing and correct identification of slides, 81 (95.3%) students felt it enhanced their skills of drawing histology diagrams, and 82 (96.4%) students believed it increased their preparedness for histology exams. However, four students disagreed that the new histology module led to an improvement in their drawing skills of histology diagrams (Table/Fig 5).

The problems reported by students during the implementation of the new module mainly included less time to prepare the topic 31 (36.5%), long duration of classes 14 (16.5%), less time for discussion of exam questions and doubt-clearing 14 (16.5%), difficulty bringing study materials to class 13 (15.3%), less time to draw slides 10 (11.7%), less time to prepare for formative assessments 7 (8.2%), and difficulty in the identification of slides 6 (7%). The solutions offered by students to these problems mostly included the announcement of histology topics beforehand and better time management 36 (42.4%), more time for exam-oriented discussions and doubt-clearing 18 (21.2%), frequent revisions and tests 9 (10.6%), reduced duration of class 8 (9.4%), and exam-oriented handouts 8 (9.4%) (Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7).

All the students unanimously agreed that in the future they would prefer the practice of the new histology module instead of the conventional method of teaching histology. Additionally, their future recommendations for the new histology module largely included frequent tests 17 (20%), frequent revision classes 16 (18.8%), doubt-clearing sessions 14 (16.5%), more time for preparation of all topics 8 (9.4%), and emphasis on slide identification 5 (5.8%) (Table/Fig 8).

The results show that the new histology teaching module may be used to teach histology in the future because of promising responses from students. Additionally, further improvements may be made to make it more learner-centric and bridge the gap between students and teachers by incorporating students’ solutions to their problems and future recommendations, as feasible.

Discussion

The results of the present study revealed that the new histology teaching module, compared to the pre-existing teaching method, was able to provide an improved understanding of histology and refined skills of drawing and identification of focused histology slides, as perceived by students.

Students’ viewpoint plays a significant role in guiding them towards their academic success (6). Additionally, the post-COVID era has necessitated the introduction of innovative methods to teach Anatomy, including histology (7). Studies conducted to observe students’ perception towards the traditional method of teaching histology found that students were enthusiastic about trying out learner-centric, modern methods of teaching histology (8),(9),(10),(11). In this context, Selvig D et al., conducted a study to identify students who were likely to face difficulties in learning histology by examining their educational background, study habits, and use of resources (12). Similarly, the present study was carried out in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic to identify students’ perception of the difficulties they faced during histology classes and examinations. The goal was to address and resolve these difficulties to improve their academic performance. As the National Medical Council aimed to shift towards a competency-based curriculum, the new histology teaching module incorporated principles of the CBME curriculum such as active learning and formative assessments.

Similar to the studies by Bloodgood RA et al., and Jurjus RA et al., the present study developed a learner-centric model for histology, utilising group activities to engage students (6),(13). Additionally, like the study by Bloodgood RA, dedicated time for self-study was incorporated (6).

This study adopted the principles of Fu X et al., study, which introduced a learner-centric multi-dimensional approach to teaching Anatomy to overcome the disadvantages of the conventional teacher-centric approach, such as passive learning and lack of interaction (5). Fu X et al., received overwhelmingly positive responses from their students, which was also reflected in their academic scores (5). Moreover, to address students’ difficulties in interpreting histology images, students were given practice in illustrations, focusing, and identification of histology slides to prepare them for histology examinations, as this was an area of difficulty identified from students’ feedback.

The current research involved the design and implementation of a histology teaching module similar to the studies by Tendolkar VA and Shekokar AV; Schoenherr DT et al., and Chimmalgi M and Hortsch M (14),(15),(16). Tendolkar VA and Shekokar AV, utilised classroom projection and emailing of histology slide images to students, receiving positive responses (14). Schoenherr DT et al., adopted a modular approach to integrating histology and anatomic pathology, while Chimmalgi M and Hortsch M used self-directed learning modules with videos blended with traditional histology teaching methods (15),(16). In contrast, the present study included additional learner-centric elements based on principles of medical education and the CBME curriculum. Maske SS et al., in their study, observed the usefulness and perception of students towards the use of WhatsApp to learn histology and received a positive response from students (17). Although the present study did not use WhatsApp to teach histology, a separate histology WhatsApp group was created to convey information regarding histology classes, share study materials and histology diagrams, and clarify students’ doubts.

Although the studies by Parker EU et al., Koshi R et al., Beylefeld A et al., and Brisbourne MAS et al., designed innovative histology teaching methods to address students’ difficulty in the interpretation of histology images, the emphasis laid by the present histology module on the identification as well as the practice of illustrations of histology slides was found to be missing in previous studies carried out in similar settings and regions (3),(18),(19),(20). Similar to the aforementioned previous studies, encouraging results were also obtained from students in the present study. Students’ feedback revealed improved understanding of histology, increased skills in focusing and correctly identifying slides, as well as improved skills in drawing histology diagrams. They reiterated that the new module boosted their preparedness for histology exams.

Thus, the new learner-centric multi-element histology module, comprising interactive histology sessions, an emphasis on drawing practice and correct identification of histology slides, along with formative assessments with feedback, can be recommended as a promising alternative to the current method of teaching histology, with suitable improvisations based on students’ problems and recommendations. Moreover, after implementation in different centres, further studies can be undertaken to explore whether there is any positive correlation between the module and students’ academic performance in histology examinations.

Limitation(s)

The present histology module was implemented in only one medical college in Eastern India. This may affect the representation of Eastern India. It would be relevant to study with a larger sample size and less margin of error.

Conclusion

The new module was found to be effective, as it was perceived by students to increase their exam preparedness through improved understanding of histology, better drawing skills, and correct identification of histology slides. Future addressing of feasible solutions and recommendations made by them would increase the chances of generating more support towards it, as well as increasing their motivation to perform better in histology exams.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the faculties of the Department of Anatomy, Medical College, Kolkata, whose support facilitated the smooth implementation of the new module. Above all, this study is dedicated to our beloved students who are the driving forces behind all our efforts.

References

1.
Hussein IH, Raad M. Once upon a microscopic slide: The story of histology. J Cytol Histol [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Jun 15];06(06). Available from: https:// www.omicsonline.org/open-access/once-upon-a-microscopic-slide-the-story-of-histology-2157-7099-1000377.php?aid=62840. [crossref]
2.
Aristotle S, Subramanian S, Jayakumar S. Effectiveness of flipped classroom model in teaching histology for first-year MBBS students based on competency-based blended learning: An interventional study. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:152.
3.
Parker EU, Reder NP, Glasser D, Henriksen J, Kilgore MR, Rendi MH. NDER: A novel web application for teaching histology to medical students. Acad Pathol. 2017;4:2374289517691061. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
CBME Curriculum for the IMG- NMC Vol I. Available from: https://www.nmc.org. in/information-desk/for-colleges/ug-curriculum/.
5.
Fu X, Wu X, Liu D, Zhang C, Xie H, Wang Y, et al. Practice and exploration of the “student-centered” multielement fusion teaching mode in human anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2022;44(1):15-23. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Bloodgood RA. Active learning: A small group histology laboratory exercise in a whole class setting utilizing virtual slides and peer education. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(6):367-73. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Abdelmohsen MM. The development and validation of a module on enhancing students’ critical thinking, collaboration and writing skills. SAR Journal. 2020;3(4):166-77. [crossref]
8.
Al-Khader A, Obeidat FN, Abu-Shahin N, Khouri NA, Kaddumi EG, Al-Qa’qa’ S, et al. Medical Students’ Perceptions of pathology and a proposed curricular integration with histology: A future vision of curricular change. Int J Morphol. 2020;38(1):38-42. [crossref]
9.
Donkin R, Rasmussen R. Student perception and the effectiveness of kahoot!: A scoping review in histology, anatomy, and medical education. Anatomical Sciences Ed. 2021;14(5):572-85. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Das S, Saha N, Chakraborty T, Shil A. Perception of students on histology learning method. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2019;18(6):11-18.
11.
Sudipa B, Suranjali S, Soumya C. Students’ perception of present teaching method of histology- a study from eastern part of India. Natl J Integr Res Med. 2017;8(5):61-66.
12.
Selvig D, Holaday LW, Purkiss J, Hortsch M. Correlating students’ educational background, study habits, and resource usage with learning success in medical histology. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8(1):01-11. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Jurjus RA, Krum J, Goldman EF. Design for learning: Adapting the microscopic anatomy laboratory to adult learners. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(3):177-81. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Tendolkar VA, Shekokar AV. A simple teaching module for histology: Integration of traditional hands-on laboratory methods and modern computer technology. IJSR. 2012;1(3):01-02. [crossref]
15.
Schoenherr DT, Dereski MO, Bernacki KD, Khayyata S, Attardi SM. Development and evaluation of an online integrative histology module: Simple design, low-cost, and improves pathology self-efficacy. Med Educ Online. 2022;27(1):2011692. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Chimmalgi M, Hortsch M. Teaching histology using Self-Directed Learning Modules (SDLMs) in a blended approach. Med Sci Educ. 2022;32(6):1455-64. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Maske SS, Kamble PH, Kataria SK, Raichandani L, Dhankar R. Feasibility, effectiveness, and students’ attitude toward using WhatsApp in histology teaching and learning. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:158. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Koshi R, Holla SJ, Chandi G. Introduction to histology through the use of familiar objects: Innovative teaching module. Clin Anat. 1997;10(5):333-36. 3.0.CO;2-R>[crossref]
19.
Beylefeld A, Hugo A, Geyer A. More learning and less teaching? Students’ perceptions of a histology podcast. South African Journal of Higher Education [Internet]. 2009 May 21 [cited 2023 Jun 15];22(5). Available from: http://www. ajol.info/index.php/sajhe/article/view/42914. [crossref]
20.
Brisbourne MAS, Chin SSL, Melnyk E, Begg DA. Using web-based animations to teach histology. Anat Rec. 2002;269(1):11-19.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62532.18474

Date of Submission: Dec 28, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 25, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 19, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 29, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 14, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 15, 2023 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com